Thursday, September 27, 2012
Advertising
It is true that consumers are
becoming less and less in control of their privacy. Cookies, and other new
technological advances, are monitoring what one does; even collecting
information about people without their knowledge if they do not know about
cookies (Greengard). Being born into a society that has already been placing
cookies into electronics makes them unaware because it has become so common for
everyone else. By advertising agency’s using cookies, the agency’s can learn
what websites or televisions channels and times would be best to broadcast
their advertisements.
Advertising industries using things
like cookies can monitor what time people are home, where their favorite stores
are, and even favorite internet sights, to find out what the best time would be
or place to sponsor their advertisements. By using cookies, advertising agencies
are technically taking polls from people without their knowledge. When
finished, the agencies know what internet sights a person has been on and what
television channels they have watched and at what times. This gives agencies
the advantage to post similar advertisements on internet sights they have
views, or broadcast commercials on channels and times pertaining connections. Deciding
how commercials to make the commercials, comes from the idea of status quo.
Advertisements do contain this idea
of a status quo. The status quo has mainly interpreted women as people that are
suppose to take care of the house and the family, while the men watch sports,
perform daring tasks, and do laborious work. This gives advertisements an idea
on how to make their commercials appeal to whatever age group, race, or sex
they choose. By using cookies, this status quo is kept updated, following what
men and women buy, along with following what times they come home and what is
being watched.
Advertising is becoming both
harmful and positive; however, the positive is greater than the negative. Invading
a person’s right to privacy by using cookies, especially since many do not know
about them, has become the negative side. The positive side, however, is that
advertising company’s are able to advertise products that are more likely to
interest the person instead of making them watch advertisements containing
information having nothing to do with what they like.
Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Cover-up
Makeup advertisements, especially for cover-up, have
strongly persuaded me for essentially all of my teenage to adult life. Growing
up, acne and rosacea have been a major self-consciousness that causes me to
feel unattractive. This is mainly due to the way society has perceived the way
beautiful women are suppose to look. Models and actresses are never shown with
blemishes, creating this myth that in order for me to have a chance of being
admired like these women, I would need clear looking skin. Model’s, along with
actresses, are even consistently used in these advertisements, bringing the
myth’s connection of these women’s beauty to the makeup they illustrate.
In this advertisement, Jessica Alba, an actress, is modeling
this new cover-up for Revlon; a cover-up that changes from white to the color
of ones skin so there is a perfect, flawless match. What this advertisement is
intending to sell me is, “in order for one to have flawless looking skin with a
cover-up that matched my skin tone; one would need to buy this cover-up.” However,
there is additionally a deeper impression that is being created, which is, “in
order to be beautiful and happy like Jessica Alba; one would merely need to
wear this makeup.” My first response to seeing this advertisement is that I
needed to have this cover-up because finding a cover-up that actually matched
my skin tone was extremely hard. In actuality, I truly did not need this
makeup. Makeup is actually one of the causes of my problem with acne, so why
would I want to buy what is causing my dilemma? This, along with other
advertising tactics used in our culture, is used to show society only what the
beginning product can cause, but not the after affect.
Monday, September 10, 2012
Honors Homework
Before taking
this honors class, the term popular culture was rarely brought up in my life,
nonetheless me having to try explaining what popular culture is. With popular
culture constantly changing, it is hard to keep track of what is popular. Susan
Smulyan commented on how most people are born into a life where their outlook
on popular culture forms from what the mass-mediated entertainment is. What
Smulyan is saying is that people are born into a popular culture which they
gain a part of forever.
After taking this class, thinking of
popular culture is hard to stop. Everyday, I wake up in the morning and put a
cell phone in my hand, turn on the television, and put on designer clothing.
Before this class, I would have said popular culture is what possessions
everyone wants to have; but now, I see popular culture is what shows a majority
of unity between the people in our nation, majority being the key word because
there are some that do not like certain popularities.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
